🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.