🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.